Navbar

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Are Your Fellow Writers Today's Editors?

Long ago, in a galaxy of writers far, far away, where editors edited and agents agented, the world of publishing was very different.

Editing is just a small part of what editors actually do these days. If you're submitting your manuscript to a publisher, it's likely being looked over by an editor who is also acting as acquisitions chief, proof-reader, query letter reader, sample chapter checker-outer, and other respectable sounding roles.

The truth is, the world of publishing has changed. The cost of printing books has become expensive. More and more people are using e-readers, and fewer and fewer writers are seeking publishers, with many opting for self-publishing. Big publishing houses no longer have the time/money/resources/manpower to spend lots of time editing manuscripts, especially from unproven authors, which leaves editors looking for stuff that needs a minimal amount of work. They want books they can put on the market asap.

So how does a poor author get the much needed editing he or she deserves?

Increasingly, the advice on writing websites is: other writers. A number of critique websites have popped up over the years, providing authors with just the right perspective they need to polish their work. Granted their manuscripts may still have to pass through a professional editor, but a critique group can help them get their work to a point where an editor may actually take it seriously.

But no number of online critique groups should ever replace the work of a decent editor.

Still, online groups deliver rapid-fire feedback to help pinpoint a problem. The range of responses will sharpen your writing. Some “critters” specialize in grammar and syntax, while others may suggest ways to improve structure. You’ll receive advice on plot, pacing, suspense and characterization. Seasoned writers are usually generous with hints and tips that improve your piece.

Nothing in life is without its drawbacks and online crit groups are no exception. Quality feedback can be spotty. Don't assume that everyone who sounds authoritative knows what he or she is talking about.

Security is always a concern. Though the United States offers strong copyright protection, there's no way to stop someone from plagiarizing or attempting to market your work. On the other hand, crit groups can actually help stop plagiarism because by submitting your piece, you record proof that work went online at a specific time.

What's you take on using critique groups?

C.W. Thomas

No comments:

Post a Comment